Prospect Park Tower

Pratt Village Green Commons

Our Neighborhood | New Urbanism

Education & Human Services | Environment | Housing | Livability | Business & Jobs

Safety & Security | Transportation | Parks, Arts, Recreation, Culture

Livability

Report: Prospect Park, Minneapolis: An Historical Survey 2001

Prospect Park Survey by Date of Construction

How do neighborhoods get designated as historical areas in Minneapolis?

Questions and Answers (Q&A) from the July 19, 2007 Meeting

NOTICE OF PROPOSED HISTORIC DISTRICT MEETING, July 19, 2007

Suggestions for Improving Life in Prospect Park, June-July 2004

Prospect Park Neighborhood Livability Vision: Create an appealing neighborhood with easy access to services and cultural resources.Create an appealing neighborhood with easy access to services and cultural resources.

The PPERRIA Livability community since 1995 has addressed improving the overall appearance of the neighborhood, establishing its sense of identity (developing neighborhood ID signs), pubicizing neighborhood services in directory format, welcoming newcomers, and organizing multicultural events. It also has pursued developing the neighborhood using the Urban Village paradigm.

The term "urban village" refers to a cohesive community within an urban area, with housing in close proximity to employment, public transportation and community services. It is comprised of paths and places, residential and business uses integrated at a pedestrian scale to fulfill many of the essential needs of daily life. The village should meet needs such as shopping, child rearing, education, arts, security, recreation and spiritual well-being. The identity of the village is defined by local landmarks or intersections with a symbolic importance established through neighborhood custom, sometimes termed "sacred places." The concept is similar to that of the "neighborhood unit," originally defined by city planner Clarence Perry in the 1930s.


Prospect Park, Minneapolis: An Historical Survey Prepared by Marjorie Pearson, Ph.D., Senior HistorianHess, Roise and Company, October 2001, 38 pages.

Download the PDF of the report. [3.6MB]

Contents:

1 Prospect Park, Minneapolis: An Historical Survey October 2001
2 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: PROSPECT PARK SURVEY
5 Preliminary Research
5 Field Survey
5 General and In-depth Research
5 Preparation of Inventory Materials and Survey Report
7 PROSPECT PARK: AN OVERVIEW OF ITS HISTORY AND ARCHITECTURE
7 Early Development
10 Institutions, Organizations, and Infrastructure
12 Twentieth-Century Development to World War II
15 The People and Organizations of Prospect Park
17 Architectural Styles and Construction Techniques in Prospect Park
20 Construction Techniques
21 Selected Architects of Prospect Park
22 Edwin Roy Ludwig
22 Menno S. Detweiler
25 The Landscape of Prospect Park
27 Conclusion
28 Designation of Individual Properties and National Register Listings to Date
28 Proposed National Register and Local Historic District
30 Proposed Individual National Register Listings and Local Designations
34 Other Sources/Bibliography


Prospect Park Survey by Date of Construction

Download the PDF of the Report Index [112KB]

NOTE: Individual Property Surveys by first letter of street name:


I thought it might be helpful if I shared a memo I prepared for a PPERRIA community meeting I attended in July. - 2nd Ward Councilmember Cam Gordon, 2007-09-17.

How do neighborhoods get designated as historical areas in Minneapolis?

The City Council, by a majority vote, makes the decision to create all landmarks or historic districts in Minneapolis. The Historic Preservation and Planning Commission also take up the decision, prior to consideration by the City Council. Those decisions are based on detailed staff analysis and recommendations. The City also looks for strong community support that is representative of a majority of property owners and stakeholders in the area, although this is not required by ordinance. Establishment of a historic district is complicated, because while it has major economic benefits for an area, it is often perceived as something negative as it does take away some ? though certainly not all ? individual property rights. Without strong consensus and understanding, such designations can lead to very time-consuming legal challenges. It is recommended that a local designation study should proceed concurrently with an intensive community education/participation effort.

As part of this process the CPED-Planning preservation team typically conducts a local designation study. These take some time and most often involve consultant services. They are somewhat easier to do if the neighborhood is national register eligible or has national register status. But such status also adds other questions that need to be considered as well since local designations have a greater “bite” in terms of the regulatory power they establish.

It is not in CPED-Planning’s adopted 2007 work plan to do a designation study this year. It could be a consideration for 2008. However, I have learned that there are more than twenty such districts in the city that have been identified as possibly having local designation status. As part of the update to the Comprehensive Plan the City is hoping to prioritize those areas.

City planning department staff is aware of the efforts in Prospect Park and has assured me that they will be keeping that in mind as they balance this with other requests as well as current staffing levels/budget resources. I think that they also recognize that redevelopment in SEMI and planning/development work related to U of M and Central Corridor also suggest that Prospect Park should be higher up on our list.

The official process as outlined in the City Code of Ordinances is included below.

ARTICLE V. DESIGNATION

599.200. Purpose.

This article is established to promote the preservation of historic resources by providing the commission with authority to recommend the designation of landmarks and historic districts and to adopt design guidelines for designated properties. (2001-Or-029, § 1, 3-2-01)

599.210. Designation criteria.

The following criteria shall be considered in determining whether a property is worthy of designation as a landmark or historic district because of its historical, cultural, architectural, archaeological or engineering significance:

(1) The property is associated with significant events or with periods that exemplify broad patterns of cultural, political, economic or social history.

(2) The property is associated with the lives of significant persons or groups.

(3) The property contains or is associated with distinctive elements of city identity.

(4) The property embodies the distinctive characteristics of an architectural or engineering type or style, or method of construction.

(5) The property exemplifies a landscape design or development pattern distinguished by innovation, rarity, uniqueness or quality of design or detail.

(6) The property exemplifies works of master builders, engineers, designers, artists, craftsmen or architects.

(7) The property has yielded, or may be likely to yield, information important in prehistory or history. (2001-Or-029, § 1, 3-2-01)

599.220. Nomination of property. Nomination of a property to be considered for designation as a landmark or historic district shall be submitted to the planning director on a nomination application form approved by the planning director and shall be accompanied by all required supporting information. A nomination may be made by any of the following:

(1) A member of the heritage preservation commission.

(2) A member of the city council.

(3) The mayor.

(4) The planning director.

(5) Any person with a legal or equitable interest in the subject property. (2001-Or-029, § 1, 3-2-01)

599.230. Commission decision on nomination. The commission shall review all complete nomination applications. If the commission determines that a nominated property appears to meet at least one of the criteria for designation contained in section 599.210, the commission may direct the planning director to commence a designation study of the property. (2001-Or-029, § 1, 3-2-01)

599.240. Interim protection.

(a) Purpose. Interim protection is established to protect a nominated property from destruction or inappropriate alteration during the designation process.

(b) Effective date. Interim protection shall be in effect from the date of the commission's decision to commence a designation study of a nominated property until the city council makes a decision regarding the designation of the property, or for twelve (12) months, whichever comes first. Interim protection may be extended for such additional periods as the commission may deem appropriate and necessary to protect the designation process, not exceeding a total additional period of eighteen (18) months. The commission shall hold a public hearing on a proposed extension of interim protection as provided in section 599.170.

(c) Scope of restrictions. During the interim protection period, no alteration or minor alteration of a nominated property shall be allowed except where authorized by a certificate of appropriateness or a certificate of no change, as provided in this chapter. (2001- Or-029, § 1, 3-2-01)

599.250. State historic preservation office review.

The planning director shall submit all proposed designations to the state historic preservation officer for review and comment within sixty (60) days. (2001-Or-029, § 1, 3-2-01)

599.260. City planning commission review.

The planning director shall submit all proposed designations to the city planning commission for review and comment on the proposal within thirty (30) days. In its review, the city planning commission shall consider but not be limited to the following factors:

(1) The relationship of the proposed designation to the city's comprehensive plan.

(2) The effect of the proposed designation on the surrounding area.

(3) The consistency of the proposed designation with applicable development plans or development objectives adopted by the city council. (2001-Or-029, § 1, 3-2-01)

599.270. Designation hearing.

Following completion of the designation study the commission shall hold a public hearing to consider the proposed designation, as provided in section 599.170. Any person having a legal or equitable interest in a nominated property shall be allowed reasonable opportunity to give testimony or present evidence concerning the proposed designation. (2001-Or-029, § 1, 3-2-01)

599.280. Commission recommendation.

Following the public hearing, the commission shall make findings with respect to the proposed designation and shall submit the same together with its recommendation to the zoning and planning committee of the city council. In making its findings and recommendation, the commission shall consider the designation criteria contained in section 599.210, the information contained in the designation study, the state historic preservation officer's comments, the city planning commission's comments, the planning director's report and all testimony and evidence received at the public hearing relating to the designation. (2001-Or-029, § 1, 3-2-01)

599.290. City council decision.

The city council shall make the final decision on all designations. (2001-Or-029, § 1, 3-2-01)

599.300. Design guidelines.

The commission shall adopt design guidelines for landmarks and historic districts. Prior to adoption, the planning director shall submit all proposed design guidelines to the state historic preservation officer for review and comment within sixty (60) days. (2001-Or-029, § 1, 3-2-01)


Questions and Answers (Q&A) from the July 19, 2007 Meeting

Download the PDF of the Q&A [36KB]


NOTICE OF PROPOSED HISTORIC DISTRICT MEETING

June 25, 2007

Dear Neighbor,

We want you to b informed of a very important neighborhood meeting in mid-July. As many of you undoubtedly know, Prospect Park has for several years been involved in the process of seeking historical designation for the neighborhood. We are now at the point at which our proposal will be submitted for federal and, subsequently, local approval. As one would expect this process involves a number of steps, one of which is community input to ensure that those affected support the designation."

The area designated is bordered on the south by Interstate 94, on the east by Emerald Ave., and on the wet by Williams Ave. S.E., and on the north, the boundary roughly parallels University Avenue including the Schneider Drug and old Tower Grocery buildings, then following a line that includes residential properties and excludes commercial properties. Historic designation would give us greater control over the nature of residential development in our neighborhood. It would also require that we develop specific guidelines to outline and define the exact nature of the control we wish to exercise. As such, this could have a potential impact on every residential property owner in Prospect Park and makes our participation in the process extremely important. All property owners will be receiving a packet of information in early September explaining the process. There is also an excellent National Park Service website on historic designation at www.cr.nps.gov/nR/. The meeting is to address concerns and answer questions at a community level. We urge you to attend.

PPERRIA Livibility Committee

PROPOSED HISTORIC DISTRICT MEETING
Thursday July 19, 2007
7:00 to 9:00 p.m.
St. Frances Cabrini Catholic Church
1500 Franklin Ave. S.E.

Agenda For Historic Designation Meeting July 19, 2007

1) Proposal for Prospect Park to be placed on the National Register Of Historic Places
(Joe Ring-5)

2) What action is before our community (Joe Ring-5)

* National Register Listing
* Local Designation

3) What benefits has Prospect Park East River Road received since National Designation
process began. (Joe Ring-15)
* Central Corridor
* Consulting Party Status
* Clarence and Sidney Place
* Pratt School Building
* 29 Street Station Plan
* Station 19

4) Historic District Study (Marjorie Pearson -30)

* What are the borders of the proposed district
* Criteria national and local
* For National Designation what is the process
* What are the benefits for National Designation
* What are the property owners obligations for National Designation

5) Local Designation (Robert Roscoe -20)

* When can Local Designation take place
* Design review and levels of review for Local Designation
* Positives for Local Designation
* Negatives for Local Designation

6) Local Designation (Cam Gordon -10)

7) Questions and answers (Dick Poppele-30)


Suggestions for Improving Life in Prospect Park (submitted through the Prospect Park E-mail list, June-July 2004)

THE NEIGHBORHOOD'S APPEARANCE

FOR WALKERS' BENEFIT & SAFETY

SAFETY & SECURITY

PET HANDLING

BUSHES, PLANTS

PARKING

CHILDREN

NEIGHBORLINESS

IMPROVE APPEARANCE OF THE FRANKLIN AVE. BRIDGE OVER 94

RECREATIONAL FIRE LAW

THE NEIGHBORHOOD'S APPEARANCE

I wish we all picked up the trash in our gutters and along the streets and sidewalks where we walk every day. Bending is great for flexibility!   

Litter & trash cleanup always appreciated! cans, wrappers, papers, etc.

Alleys should be given the equivalent or more attention than the front yards.

Quit treating the neighborhoods neglected look as if it were the equivalent of natural or wild.

Junk cars and stored in driveways. Nonoperative vehicles should be towed away.

I am grateful to the neighbors who have in some years planted and tended flowers around our corner mailbox. I understand that they might not take on this extra project every year but it sure is fun when they do!

Help keep posted postings and flyers current:

-if you post a lost and found announcement, please remove your announcements when lost item is found.
-if you post a notice for an event, please remove your notice when the event is past.
-feel free to remove others' announcements for past events!

FOR WALKERS' BENEFIT & SAFETY

Keep an eye out for uneven sidewalks.

Rose bushes with thorns and low tree limbs with dangling light bulbs are especially
unnerving to folks on the sidewalk.

Amen to your suggestion about the brush overhanging the sidewalk.

I wish neighbors with automatic irrigation would end their schedule by 5:30 a.m. so I don't get a surprise shower when the system starts up next to me during my early morning walk.

I wish neighbors would set up their garden and lawn watering to avoid sidewalks at all times so I don't have to go into the street to avoid getting wet.

(See also BUSHES, PLANTS.)

SAFETY & SECURITY

Drive slowly in the neighborhood. Arthur is especially bad for people driving fast. I also yell to people to slow down if their windows are open.

I wish people would drive more slowly through the neighborhood - the curvy streets make things dangerous.

Leave a front light on at night. They don't have to be floodlights, but a small porch or front window or even a lawn light makes any neighborhood seem a bit more friendly & safe. Gardensin Prospect Park are beautiful in the evening, too! It costs less than 75 cents per month to have an efficient light bulb on all night.

Turn on their front door lights at night when it gets dark and either leave them on all night or turn them off when they go to bed. I leave my backdoor light on all night because it is next to our garage and the front door light on for several hours. You can buy a timer for about $20 at Home Depot that can be installed into the light switch so lights will go on and off automatically. I also think installing motion lights near garages is good.

(See also BUSHES, PLANTS.)

PET HANDLING

Dogs
I wish our friends and neighbors who own dogs were more respectful of all the people living around them and did not put their dogs outside unattended to bark.  We need to be thoughtful about how sustained or intermittent dog noise can detrimentally affect the quality of life for those many families living around us. Remember the great change in behavior around dog droppings:  as recently as the 70s and early 80s, we let our dogs poop in other people's yards or along the streets and sidewalks.  Now, we always carry plastic bags and pick up the droppings.  In the same way, I hope we will become progressive on this noise issue.    

All pet cats and dogs with /collars and ID tags. The burden of finding the owner of a distressed, lost or hurt pet should not be on each other's neighbors. If only they could talk

I wish that dog owners would not let their dogs roam all over other people's front yards and "do their business" on their plants, bushes, and grass! It is disgusting and offensive to look out my front window and watch a dog "go" wherever it pleases in my yard, and it is infuriating to step into a dog pile on the boulevard.

Please add to the wish list-that folks would not exercise their dogs off lead except in their own yard or one of the designated dog parks. If anyone needs info on location of the dog parks or how to get a permit for the dog parks, I'd be happy to send that as well.

Reports should be filed by individuals with Mpls Animal Control for all incidents involving all aggressive behavior in dogs. A report can only be filed upon an incident. If the report waits, it means someone else has gotten threatened or hurt in the future! We should support an environment where neighbors can feel good about filing a report in the neighborhood because it means the larger safety of our elders and children. Sometimes people think it isn't nice to file a report on a neighbor's dog. Children walk to school with Pratt, etc. It really should not be tolerated.

BUSHES, PLANTS

I received a letter from the inspector stating that I would be fined if bushes were not trimmed to a height of 7 feet above the sidewalk by June 23, I think it was. I complied. Since then I have noticed many other homes with more low hanging shrubbery than I had & theirs is still hanging low. Were they fined? Does the inspector follow up?
Items that should NOT be trimmed until winter: Oaks & elms. I would like to see advice on other items that can and can't be trimmed in summer. If trees are planted in the boulevard, the city is responsible for trimming them. The city said that I could wait on the one hanging elm branch.

I'm 6'4.5" and the honeysuckles and lilacs hanging over the sidewalks require me to duck, bob, weave and do the limbo throughout our early evening constitutionals...

If people own property adjacent to where an alley outlets onto a street, it would be great if they could be sure to cut back vegetation so that cars coming out of the alley have good visibility of pedestrians on the sidewalk and cars on the street. For example, at the end of my alley, I'm so afraid that I'll hit a pedestrian walking on the sidewalk, since there are some overgrown lilacs on the adjacent property which make it impossible to seen an approaching pedestrian until they are virtually under my tires.

Along with trimming shrubs, eliminating buckthorn. Some people don't understand it is an invasive scrub and let it grow for the birds. My Girl Scout troop and I have helped along the river to get rid of buckthorn only to see it replanted by the birds.

In addition to your suggestion for trimming bushes, it would be helpful if those people who live on corners would trim any shrubs that block the view of on-coming cars. It would also be safer if people trimmed the shrubbery near the end of their driveways so they could see pedestrians better when they are backing out.

That triangle that's near PPUMC is nice, if a bit overgrown that last time I looked at it but the plants are so tall it's impossible to see around it and is actually a hindrance to drivers trying to negotiate it. I try to avoid coming to Pratt that direction because I don't want to have to deal with it.

Scrap brush cleared from Tower Hill especially Malcolm and Orlin sides. An unattractive entry impression into our neighborhood. History designates it as "Oak Savanna" basically oaks with prairie grass and very little else! Now a national historic site but does not reflect that environmentally. On a practical side for current living - scrap brush houses mosquitoes, wood ticks, problematic other... Many are invasive and non- native plant volunteers. Those invasive plants spread in our yards too!

PARKING

Why isn't there parking on only one side of these narrow, winding streets?

I wish people wouldn't park too close to my driveway; it makes it difficult to drive my car in and out. Could we get together and (with permission from the city) paint yellow curbs out a certain distance from selected driveways?

I wish people would be careful about parking on the sharp curves. When you're driving, it is hard enough to see around those curves (many of which don't have stop signs or the like) without cars further blocking your view. Perhaps this would be something to address with the city - some curbs could be painted yellow or something.

CHILDREN

Have at least one safe clear place for kids to sled on Tower Hill without fear of hitting your head seriously on a tree. It's dangerous and no fun. We should as a community of neighbors provide good fun wholesome alternative recreation for our neighborhood kids.

It is my understanding that there used to be a PPERRIA approved shortcut between 2 yards (on the N. side of Franklin) that went from Seymour over to Orlin. This was to save school kids and playmates and others having to walk around the long block up the Seymour hill (toward the Tower) or around the other long block of Melbourne over to Orlin and back toward the Tower. You can still see the vestiges of it on Orlin, but not so much on Seymour. 2 rental properties have since filled it in with storage. On Seymour, the entrance of the short cut was 2 houses south of the Pages new house and 2 houses north of the Schwabachers. On the Orlin side, it goes on the left hand side by a very small gray colonial rental (if you are facing the house). You can see where the old path would have gone. We have similar shortcuts on Arthur for access to the park and playground. All the kids want to play together and sure makes life easier, You could avoid the big Seymour hill which is hard for even me, not to mention others - seniors etc., to walk up. And going around the Melbourne way is ridiculous!

NEIGHBORLINESS

I wish my neighbors would come out of their houses now and again when I'm outside and say hello, or pause when they are rushing away in their cars to say hello. I have lived in the "hood for 3 years and am slowly getting to know folks - I love it but would like to meet more people.

I would like to see more people hanging out in their front yards. I wouldn't even recognize all the neighbors on my block and would like to say hi to people as I walk past.

Living in PP is a positive experience because of the respectful manner in which people treat each other. I appreciate this manner and hope to contribute to it.

IMPROVE APPEARANCE OF THE FRANKLIN AVE. BRIDGE OVER 94

Perhaps this idea extends beyond the immediate scope of your question, but it has occurred to me that if the neighborhood was able to improve Franklin bridge crossing 94E (such as with nicer railings, improved sidewalks, perhaps some ivy), the entire neighborhood would benefit, including by appearing more connected to the river. I believe the UMN Design Institute had worked with the City a couple of years ago, proposing revisions to many of the bridges crossing highway 94. The idea is to revamp these bridges one at a time, with each taking on a unique design rather than the usual "highway engineer" solution (note the 3rd Avenue bridge crossing 94E near the Convention Center). While such extreme makeovers may not be in our immediate capacity to pursue, we might at least consider lobbying for upgrades to the surface treatments.

RECREATIONAL FIRE LAW

There is a city ordinance which allows people to burn certain item (like dead trees and brush, but not leaves and carpentry materials) in their yard in a 3 feet by 3 feet monitored area. It allows people to have recreational fires as well, in the same amount of space. We have done this to get rid of the dead tree branches left in our back yard. We also have an outdoor fireplace for nights we sit out to keep away the bugs. A neighbor, I'm sure out of safety concerns, called the fire department. The fire department came and left with an apology. I respect my neighbors concern for safety and would not jeapordise my property or theirs. Please let people know these rules from City of Minneapolis Fire Departments website:

Recreational Fires
Revised: October 2000
Approved: Fire Marshal

1. Recreational Fires - No Permit Required
a) Size - Small fires less than 3 feet in diameter and 2 feet or less in height are permitted.
b) Location - Recreational fires shall not be conducted within 25 feet of a structure or combustible materials unless contained in a fire ring. Conditions that could cause a fire to spread within 25 feet of a structure shall be eliminated prior to ignition. A surrounding fire barrier of non-combustible material that is at least 6 inches in height must be used. The size of the fire prior to ignition must meet the requirements listed in #1.
c) General provisions also apply.

2. Barbecue Appliances - No Permit Required
a) Freestanding barbecue pits or approved burning appliances (freestanding fireplaces) shall maintain a clearance of not less than 15 feet from structures and other combustible materials.
b) General provisions also apply.

3. General Provisions
a) Materials - Only unpainted wood, which has not been treated with chemicals or preservatives, coal or charcoal may be burned. Open burning of rubbish is prohibited.
b) Fire extinguishing equipment - Buckets, shovels, garden hoses or a fire extinguisher with a minimum 4A rating shall be readily available for use at recreational fires.
c) Attendance - Every recreational fire shall be constantly attended by a competent person and shall be completely extinguished before leaving the scene.
d) Hours - Recreational fires shall be conducted between the hours of 9:00 a.m. and 10:00 p.m.

Our Neighborhood

Resource Directory

Neighborhood Events

History

Hot Topics

Maps / Neighbors

NRP

PPERRIA

Pratt / Luxton

Contact Us

Sitemap

HOME

 



Prospect Park East River Road neighborhood of Minneapolis

Our Neighborhood | Resource Directory | Neighborhood Events | History
Hot Topics | Maps / Neighbors | NRP | PPERRIA
Pratt / Luxton |  Contact Us | Sitemap | Home

© 1994-2008, PPERRIA. All rights reserved except permission to copy granted provided
all attribution preserved (names, dates, PPERRIA, etc.).

For questions or comments please contact the webmaster.

Site modification history and people responsible for site maintainance listed on the credits page.